A Sociological and Cultural Analysis of the Factors Contributing «to the Marginalization» of Female Designers at the Bauhaus School and Their Agency Strategies

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Instructor, Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Art, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Abstract

The Bauhaus, one of the most influential art and design schools of the twentieth century, was founded on the principle of equal admission for all applicants, regardless of age, gender or educational background. This promise attracted a considerable number of women. However, in practice, Walter Gropius adopted policies that restricted women’s participation to certain workshops. Despite these limitations, the work of several women proved so impactful that the workshops in which they studied and practiced became the school’s primary sources of income through contracts with industry.
The aim of this study is to examine the contextual conditions that led to this policy shift and, in parallel, to trace the pathways through which Bauhaus women challenged Gropius’s assumptions about creativity as a male domain. From a gendered-historical perspective, it also seeks to answer the question of why the contributions of successful Bauhaus women have been diminished or erased in the historiography of art, design, and architecture. The research method is descriptive-analytical, grounded in a qualitative approach.
To better understand the circumstances of women’s education and professional activity at the Bauhaus, the educational background and selected works of three of its most influential women—Gunta Stölzl, Anni Albers, and Marianne Brandt -are briefly examined. The findings indicate that, contrary to the patriarchal belief prevalent in early twentieth-century Europe- that women were suited only for artistic and two-dimensional work due to alleged cognitive limitations compared to men -Bauhaus women fully absorbed the school’s pedagogical philosophy. Through creative experimentation with new methods and materials, they succeeded in guiding the workshops toward a dynamic responsiveness to the needs of society and industry. Moreover, even after their forced migration, they continued to expand this trajectory, not only by introducing innovative methods of production but also by engaging with and drawing upon the cultural capacities of other societies to generate further innovations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

- پارسونز، گلن (1400)، فلسفه دیزاین، (ترجمه افشین پاکباز)، تهران: نشر مشکی.
- سلیمانی، بهزاد (1393)، باهاوس وایمار، تهران: نشر ژاله.
- چراغی­ کوتیانی، اسماعیل (1390)، هنر و زیبایی شناسی فمینیسم، معرفت فرهنگی اجتماعی، 3 (1). 29-54.
- چوپانکاره، وحید؛ حبیبی، مریم (1397)، بررسی تاریخی و کارکردی وسایل روشنایی شاخص باوهاوس، نشریه هنرهای زیبا - هنرهای تجسمی ، 23(1)، 114- 103.
- ویتفورد، فرانک (1393)، باهاوس: زادگاه هنر مدرن، (ترجمه مژگان محمدیان)، تهران: نشر موج.
- Aron, J.S. (2013), Woven Images: From the Bauhaus Weaving Workshop to the Knoll Textile Division, Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
- Buckley, C. (1986), Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design, Design Issues. 3(2). pp. 3-14.
- Bunting, G. (2022), Frauhaus: Gunta Stölzl and the women of the Bauhaus, DailyArt Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/frauhaus-gunta-stolzl-walter-gropius-and-the-women-of-the-bauhaus
- Deckers, M. (2019), The weaver’s laboratory: Gunta Stölzl’s sample cards as materialities of research. In B. Dogramaci (Ed.), Textile Moderne/Textile Modernism (pp. 169–178). Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.
- Fay, K. (2014), Anni and Josef Albers: Mexican travels, touristic experiences and artistic responses. Unpublished master's thesis, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
- Glover, C. (2012), Anni Albers’s modernist philosophy in thread and text, Unpublished master's thesis. Florida State University, College of Visual Arts, Theatre & Dance. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5954
- Katsarova, I. (2021), The Bauhaus movement: Where are the women? European Parliamentary Research Service.
- Kim, H. (2022), Re-framing Anni Albers and Bauhaus, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 41(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12423
- Ledford, K. R. (2020), Anni Albers: From Bauhaus to Black Mountain (Master’s thesis), University of South Carolina. Scholar Commons. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5954
- Leutner, P. (2022), Fashionable Bauhaus: Translating the Bauhaus esthetics into textile and fashion design, Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 20(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2021.1964228
- Mayer, C. (2022), Exhibiting the past: Women in art and design in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, In Exhibiting the past: Public histories of education (pp. 239–262). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110719871-012
- Pandolfo, B., & McDermott, R. (2021), Out of the shadows: The work of Marianne Brandt at Ruppelwerk, Journal of Design Thinking, 2(2), 113–122.
- Rawsthorn, A. (2007), The tale of a teapot and its creator, The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/style/16iht-design17.1.8763227.html
- Ray, K. R. (2001), Bauhaus hausfraus: Gender formation in design education, Journal of Architectural Education, 55(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648801753199491
- Rodríguez, M. V. (2020), An introduction to the impact of Bauhaus multi-disciplinary pedagogical model on its female students, AusArt, 8(1), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.21527
- Rössler, P., & Blümm, A. (2019), Soft skills and hard facts: A systematic assessment of the inclusion of women at the Bauhaus, In E. Otto & P. Rössler (Eds.), Bauhaus bodies: Gender, sexuality, and body culture in modernism’s legendary art school (Visual Cultures and German Contexts, pp. 3–24), Bloomsbury Visual Arts. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501344817.ch-001
- Weber, N. F., & Asbaghi, P. T. (1999), Anni Albers (Published on the occasion of the exhibition Anni Albers, held at Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice; Josef Albers Museum, Bottrop; Musée des Arts Décoratifs, Paris; and The Jewish Museum, New York, 1999–2000). New York, NY: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
- URL 1: https://www.textileartist.org/textile-artist-gunta-stolzl-1983       Accessed at 20-08-2022
- URL 2: https://culturearts.co.uk/products/kandinsky-improvisation-no-30-1913-wall-art-print     Accessed at 20-08-2022
- URL 3: https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/gunta-stolzl-teacher-and-director-textile-workshop-bauhaus         Accessed at 20-08-2022
- URL 4: https://www.wassilykandinsky.net/work-370.php      Accessed at 22-08-2022
- URL 5: https://www.guntastolzl.org/Works/Bauhaus-Weimar-1919-1925/Designs-for-Carpets-and-Wall/i-R7ckfgB Accessed at 22-08-2022
- URL 6: https://www.ideelart.com/magazine/theo-van-doesburg      Accessed at 24-08-2022
- URL7:https://www.moma.org/collection/works/1997?artist_id=5675&page=1&sov_referrer=artist     Accessed at 04-02-2023
- URL 8: https://www.textileartist.org/textile-artist-gunta-stolzl-1897-1983/gunta-stolzl-wall-hanging-slit-tapestry-red-green-1927-28            Accessed at 02-02-2023

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 15 April 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics